Saturday, May 17, 2008

Jaipur; Dawood Ibrahim; Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline; the CIA; Rajiv Ghandi; Gujarat


The Jaipur Bombs were sophisticated.

"“The kind of material used, the structure of the explosives and the way it was used, is not the work of any ordinary person,” said Gulab Chand Kataria, the home minister of the state of Rajasthan, where Jaipur is located. The explosive, known as Royal demolition explosive, or RDX, was packed with ball bearings...

"India’s most deadly terrorist attack in recent years saw 257 people killed in a series of 13 blasts in Mumbai in 1993. The blasts were allegedly masterminded by Dawood Ibrahim, the head of an organised crime syndicate." - Jaipur ‘one of a thousand cuts’

If Dawood Ibrahim's organisation was involved in Jaipur, we should remember that Dawood Ibrahim is, reportedly, linked to the CIA. (aangirfan: Dawood Ibrahim of the CIA?)

Would the CIA get involved in terrorism in India?

Asia Times (http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/DG13Df01.html) told us the following:
Rajiv Gandhi, Prime Minister of India, was killed in 1991 by the Sri Lankan Tamil Tigers -Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.

Justice Jain's final investigated the conspiracy to assassinate Gandhi.

He came across evidence that one suspect known as Chandraswami had links with the CIA and Mossad, and through them with the LTTE.

Justice Jain 'seems convinced' that Chandraswami was involved.

According to Asia Times:

Justice Jain 'has linked Chandraswami with the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) in which arms dealer Adnan Kashoggi, several terrorist groups, and intelligence outfits like the CIA and Mossad had accounts.

'The money in it was used for terrorist operations and political assassinations. The report is quoted as saying that $4 million of Mr Kashoggi's money was transferred to the LTTE's accounts. Justice Jain had said this on the basis of a 130-page document prepared by US Senator John Kiri.

'The commission quotes evidence of former cabinet secretary Zafar Saiffullah who said Chandraswami had links with Mossad and the CIA, and that the government had received intercepts of wireless communication between Israel (where Mossad is based) and Jaffna (where the LTTE was operating till recently) which established Chandraswami's involvement...

'Money transactions in Chandraswami's name and his links with international arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi and the now defunct Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) have made the commission point an accusing finger...'


Jaipur

Who gains from the May 2008 bombs in Jaipur in India?

Who wants to turn Indians against Iran and Pakistan; and make Indians more friendly with the USA and Israel?

Iran's President Mahmud Ahmadinejad visited India in April 2008.

1. "Ahmadinejad's visit is perhaps the first time that the Congress-party led New Delhi government headed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has stood up to the United States on Iran". (Asia Times India raises a toast to Iran)

2. "The India-US civilian nuclear deal is almost dead due to domestic Indian political opposition." (India raises a toast to Iran)

3. Indian Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon now says the Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline is "doable". (India raises a toast to Iran)


Gas from Iran?

The awamibharat blog looks at the bombs in Jaipur, India, May 2008, (AWAMI BHARAT: Jaipur Serial Terror Attack) and makes the following points:

1. The bombs come "on the eve of major global demonstrations against the Zionist Apartheid State of Israel."

Thus the media can refer to "Muslim Terrorism" rather than opposition to Zionist Israel.

2. The Mumbai terror attacks of July 11, 2006 were on the very same day that Israel launched its war on Lebanon.

3. The terror attack on the Sankat Mochan Mandir in Varanasi (7th March 2006) came 5 days after the demonstrations and protests against the visit of Bush to India on May 2, 2006.

"The terror attack proved very useful to counter the growing unity of the Indian masses against US-Zionist imperialism."

4. The terror attacks in Hyderabad (2007) were related to the issue of the Indo-US Nuclear Deal.

The fate of the Congress led UPA government was at stake.

5. Every terror attack "pushes the Indian people into the waiting arms of George Bush and Ehud Olmert, who thrive in promoting terror.


Photo from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ahmedabad_riots1.jpg


In October 2007, the investigative newsmagazine Tehelka reported on the Tehelka Gujarat riots sting :

1. Several Hindu nationalist (Sangh) leaders explain on camera how they planned a massive massacre of Moslems.

(http://www.tehelka.com/story_main35.asp?filename=Ne031107spycam_videos.asp)

2. The involvement of the Chief minister of Gujarat (Modi) is revealed.

3. The complicity of the police is revealed.

4. The connivance of the judiciary is revealed.

Frontline India ( Action replay) commented:

"Yet, no action has followed one of the most explosive news investigations in India.

"None of those caught on tape boasting about raping, burning and hacking Muslims have been arrested or even interrogated.

"Modi’s authority has not been questioned.

"Instead, there is an eerie silence. Far more eerie than the cold-blooded murders of more than 1,000 innocent people during the communal massacres of March 2002.

"The role of the Modi government in the State-sponsored terrorism of 2002 is well documented. Even the Supreme Court had censured Modi for being 'a modern day Nero who watched while Gujarat burned'.

"Now, the Tehelka tapes offer irrefutable proof of how the Sangh (Hindu nationalists) organised a 'Hindu jihad' across Gujarat and protected the murderers."

(Tehelka comment -Does Anything)

~~

aangirfan: India falls in love with Israel and deserts Iran

aangirfan: Mossad increases its control of India

Terrorist bombings: A failure of Indian intelligence

India needs oil from Iran


1 comment:

autores said...

but it seems that India does not see the relationship India Iran as a ratio to its salvageable Indians who live and work in Iran. When I wrote I wrote the hangings salvageable. India may even 'do save the death penalty in Iran Indians said no and refused to do anything to save the Indians. I understand that very often we can not 'do this but they say no. Unfortunately, that 's not who said India. India said it has complete disregard to avoid the hanging their Indian retaining the interest of Iran in its territory but without considering and assessing which 'fault and because of its disagreement with their hanging. I made a good offer of freedom 'and life. India says: No thanks. I have also given the offer of the preview of their hangings, India has no answer contacts.